My interpretation of this word puzzle is that "the man" in reference is the speaker's son.
The way I looked at this is by parsing the sentence into two, with the conjunction used as a separator. The first part says the speaker (let's say A) has no brothers or sisters. The second part says there is a man, and that man's father equals my father's son.
I then parsed this into two phrases ("That man's father" and "My father's son") with the "is" acting as an equal sign. From the second phrase, I deduced that it means the same as A's father's son, which equates to A. Hence, the first phrase equals. A, and so that man's father is the speaker himself.
What I found interesting in the end is that the first sentence has no effect on the second sentence. Removing either would not change the relationship deduced in the second part.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Final Reflection
Looking back over the semester, I feel I have become more attached to mathematics as a subject area. My original area of study was econom...
-
Looking back over the semester, I feel I have become more attached to mathematics as a subject area. My original area of study was econom...
-
My first reaction to seeing the dishes problem is to scour through methods that are familiar to me, including solve it algebraically: Supp...
-
How I can draw 30 equally spaced points on a circle? This was my initial reaction to the puzzle. I then decided to experiment with other n...
No comments:
Post a Comment